Why "Something" prevails over speculative Nothing
Epistemic necessity and the asymmetry of explanation
The persistent question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" seems to implicitly assume that "nothing" represents a simpler, more probable default state. I will argue how this assumption is fundamentally flawed. Drawing on principles of epistemic humility and intuitionistic reasoning, I will demonstrate that "something", existence governed by o…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Unfinished business to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
